“Your flood map doesn’t include your shareholder meeting. It should.”

When people hear “climate risk,” they think of rising seas and melting ice. But in 2025, climate shocks are no longer slow, distant, or confined to the Global South. They’re fast, multi-system, and deeply entangled with corporate stability, political legitimacy, and reputational trust.

At Oakas, we work with clients who’ve faced climate-related disruptions and it’s never just about weather! It’s about cascading system failure. And it’s coming faster than most preparedness plans assume.

From Weather Event to Systemic Shock

Let’s unpack a real composite scenario (built from several client-facing incidents):

1. A coastal HQ is flooded during a once-in-a-century storm.

2. The CEO is grounded and unable to attend an emergency board meeting.

3. Staff comms go down due to a power outage.

4. An activist group posts images of abandoned facilities and accuses the company of climate negligence.

5. Local government declares an emergency, redirecting supply chain resources.

6. An investor group issues a statement questioning the company’s resilience.

This started with a flood. It ended with a reputational and financial spiral. That’s the second and third order effect landscape we now operate in.

Why “Environment” Is Too Narrow

1. It’s political

Climate resilience is no longer apolitical. Leaders are being judged by the public, regulators, and their own staff on their readiness, ethics, and equity in response.

2. It’s financial

Insurance is collapsing in some regions. Shareholder groups are demanding climate exposure disclosures. Access to capital increasingly hinges on visible resilience.

3. It’s reputational

Whether it’s real or perceived, slow or sudden, companies are now held publicly accountable for how they anticipate, respond to, and recover from climate-linked shocks.

Common Failures We See

At Oakas, we’ve reviewed dozens of client frameworks. These are the most common blind spots:

• “The facility is fine” ≠ “The operation is fine.”
  Supply routes, staffing, and perception often matter more than physical damage.

• Plans assume too much lead time.
  Floods, fires and storms now develop in hours and compound with political or digital disruption.

• Communication plans are disconnected from environmental triggers.
  Messaging needs to align with public emotion, media scrutiny and stakeholder expectations not just internal updates.

• ESG is viewed as compliance, not strategy.
  Climate is not just a governance risk, it’s a leadership test.

What Forward-Looking Leaders Are Doing

1. Integrating climate into crisis planning

Not just having a “flood plan” but also folding extreme weather into all simulations, decision-making matrices, and communications drills.

2. Monitoring cascading threats

Using cross-functional intelligence from weather alerts to social media monitoring to detect how physical events could trigger digital, operational or reputational outcomes.

3. Practising mixed-mode crises

Flood + power cut + data breach. Fire + protest + political fallout. These combinations are no longer rare and training for them builds the muscle to lead through complexity.

What We Do at Oakas

We help clients:

• Run simulations that begin with climate and unfold into multi-dimensional crises

• Stress-test assumptions about infrastructure, supply chain, leadership succession, media response

• Build decision frameworks that include social, political, and reputational layers

• Prepare boards and senior leadership for tough public scrutiny, even when the event is “nobody’s fault”

Final Word

You can’t control the rain. But you can control the fallout.

The organisations that endure are the ones that prepare not just for the event, but for the chain reaction.

That’s what we do. And we can do it with you.

→ Talk to us about climate-integrated crisis planning
→ Book a cross-system simulation
→ Subscribe for our latest insights